Showing posts with label film history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film history. Show all posts

Monday, August 3, 2015

You're A Virgin, Who Can't Drive!


Published: July 7th, 2015
As If!: The Oral History of Clueless as told by Amy Heckerling and the Cast and Crew
By: Jen Chaney
Touchstone
ISBN-13:  9781476799087

Acclaimed pop culture journalist Jen Chaney shares an oral history of the cult classic film Clueless in the ultimate written resources about one of the most influential, revered, and enduring movies of the 1990s -- in celebration of its twentieth anniversary.

Will we ever get tire of watching Cher navigate Beverly Hills high school and discover true love in Clueless?  As if!  Written by Amy Heckerling and starring Alicia Silverstone, Clueless is an enduring comedy classic that remains one of the most streamed movies on Netflix, Amazon, and iTunes even twenty years after its release.  Inspired by Jane Austen's Emma, Clueless is an everlasting pop culture staple.

In the first book of its kind, Jen Chaney has compiled an oral history of the making of this iconic film using recollections and insights from key cast and crew members involved in the making of this endlessly quotable, ahead-of-its-time production.  Get a behind-the-scenes look at how Emma influenced Heckerling to write the script, how the stars were cast in each of their roles, what was involved in creating the costumes, sets, and soundtrack, and much more.

Review



I really enjoyed this one! I'm grading up a tad bit due to nostalgia factor -- plus I'm looking forward to looking at the production/publicity pictures I'm sure will be included in the finalized copy. If you're a fan of Clueless, but don't know everything about it already, you will find this to be a fun book. It's mostly transcription of interviews, etc. with the cast and crew of the film that are still alive (the notable exception being the late Brittany Murphy, aka Tai) and there are some great stories from filming. Like the story behind the real Mr. Hall and the last-minute casting of the mugger who holds up Cher at the gas station.



I especially loved the stories from Amy Heckerling, Twink Caplan (associate producer and "Ms. Geist"), Paul Rudd, and Donald Faison.  It follows from the pre-production and planning of Clueless, all the way to the cultural zeitgeist existing today.  We get insights into the costumes, acting, directing, the soundtrack (with interviews from a few of the artists), and just about everything else involved in making a movie that you could possibly think of!  Obviously there are some things that slightly contradict each other -- no one's memory is perfect after 20 years.  But it's funny seeing them argue with each other over certain things and to get opposing viewpoints is wonderful.  I'd recommend it if you're a fan of Clueless at all, you'll be surprised at how much you learn and the fun you have doing it!  Thank you to NetGalley for this eArc to read and enjoy! :D


VERDICT:  3.5/5  Stars

*I received this book from Touchstone, on NetGalley.  No favors or money were exchanged for this review.  This book was originally published on July 7th, 2015.*

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Broken Silence: Conversations with 23 Silent Film Stars by: Michael Ankerich



Published:  May 28th, 1993
Broken Silence: Conversation with 23 Silent Film Stars
By: Michael G. Ankerich
McFarland and Company
ISBN-13:  9780899508351

The silent film era is brought to life in this collection of interviews with 23 stars of the silent era: Lew Ayres, Madge Bellamy, Junior Coghlan, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., Dorothy Gulliver, Maxine Elliott Hicks and 17 others.

Review

     Seeing as this is not my usual YA fiction, the format of this review is a little different than most of the ones that I do for this blog.  I am very into film history, especially silent film history.  I believe that those were the best days to be working independently in the movie business and that's when stars were really made.  I was very interested to read a book that has interviews and first-hand accounts of that era, from people that were actually there.  I was definitely excited that he was able to share interviews with Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. and Madge Bellamy.  All twenty three stars had something fun to reminisce about and I was happy to read their stories about becoming/being film stars.  A major disappointment for me was the lack of overall content in this book.  A lot of the book was comprised of footnotes and individually complete filmography of all of the stars.  Considering the fact that a good portion of the films in the footnotes probably don't even exist anymore, it was like having a carrot dangled in front of you while you're starving.  It was just plain cruel.  I enjoyed the idea of such a book, but it wasn't as all encompassing as I'd hoped.  It was an interesting read and worth the time of any silent film nut who is interested in the forgotten stars of the era.  If you're busy looking for familiar faces, I wouldn't bother.

VERDICT:  3.5/5  Stars

*No money or favors were exchanged for this review. This book is now available in stores, online, or maybe even at your local library.*

Friday, August 24, 2012

Disney Animated Film Critique # 3: Fantasia (1940)


   So my fellow book minions, I don't know about any of you but I have a serious obsession with animated films (whether they're Disney or not). But the most recognizable in my culture as an American citizen are the main 50 animated films produced by Walt Disney's film studio, in chronological order. I might do some side posts with critiques of live-action Disney films, animated sequels, Disney-Pixar films, or even ones like The Nightmare Before Christmas who have oddball status, with no specific categorization. But this is something that I have been considering for quite awhile and I finally decided to take the plunge. The criteria will be: plot, characters, music/songs/score, design/animation, and cultural/historical context and/or overall effect of the other elements. So take a seat, grab some popcorn and some soda and be prepared to find out the verdict.

PLOT

This film is revered in part because it has no plot whatsoever!  I tried to be objective, but this was a huge sticking point for me.  Yes, I understand that it's very experimental nature was genius at the time and still is.  It opened up the animate medium for people who have more creativity than just straight-as-a-line plots in there heads, ready for transcription.  So instead of a plot, here is the program, which will also double as the music section in part:

Toccata and Fugue in D Minor by Johann Sebastian Bach
Nutcracker Suite by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
The Sorcerer's Apprentice by Paul Dukas
The Rite of Spring by Igor Stravinsky
Intermission/Meet the Soundtrack by Philadelphia Orchestra
The Pastoral Symphony by Ludwig van Beethoven
Dance of the Hours by Amilcare Ponchielli
Night on Bald Mountain by Modest Mussorgsky
Ave Maria by Franz Schubert

*Critique:  It is an interesting interpretation of traditional classical music pieces.  It definitely wasn't the normal plot format that had been instituted for animated films already (by Disney himself and some others).  Fun to watch if you want someone else's ideas about what music would look like floating around in your head.  All it managed to do for me was put me to sleep.

CHARACTERS

The only real 'characters' that we even meet throughout this piece are the Sorcerer and his apprentice (a.k.a. Mickey Mouse).  Neither is very sympathetic.  Mickey just wants to take the easy way out, using magic to animate the broom and have it doe his work.  The Sorcerer ends up having to fix his mistakes, because Mickey can't control the magic that he's unleashed.  But the Sorcerer doesn't even really seem to bother telling Mickey WHY what he did was wrong, just scolding him slightly and genericly instead.  Also, another character that bothered me was Zeus in The Pastoral Symphony sequence.  He just appears and starts throwing around lightning bolts maniacally, for what appears to be no reason at all!  Yes Zeus is a volatile being, but I never thought that was synonymous with insanity and stupidity.  Maybe I was wrong.

*Critique:  Overall the lack of plot also means that there is a lack of fleshed out characters.  This is something that makes an enormous difference to me as a viewer.  I literally fell asleep while watching this Wednesday night.  I picked up where I left off last night - but I fell asleep again.  If my brain isn't actively engaged in some sort of way I am BORED.  This is something that became abundantly clear while trying to watch this film.

MUSIC

The music in this film was all classical work, written by a variety of composers over the centuries.  Most of it was also very famous and easily recognizable.  It was performed by the Philadelphia Orchestra and conducted by Leopold Stokowski.  Disney collaborated with RCA to get the illusion that the orchestra was in the theater with the audience.  They developed Fantasound, which used the first stereophonic surround sound system and innovated overdubbing, noise reduction and simultaneous mutli-track recording.  Fantasia has the longest running soundtrack of a Disney film, going for nearly two hours straight. 

*Critique:  It is very well played classical music and you can tell that musicians are having fun, especially during the intermission jam session.  If I sat up, with my eyes closed and didn't even watch the movie it would've been a singularly enjoyable experience for me.  But I had to judge this on all aspects, not just the music.

DESIGN/ANIMATION

Animation - While making Fantasia, over 1,000 artists and technicians were utilized.  The movie has over 500 characters that make an appearance.  The segments were color-keyed scene by scene, so they would mesh together well. There was an overall color scheme for each piece of music, that was patterned specifically for the individual subject matter that they developed.  3-D clay models were sculpted so the animators could see the characters from every angle while drawing.  It was a very intense process.

*Critique:  As a total Disneyphile, I can completely appreciate and respect how much time, effort and overall blood, sweat and tears went into the animation and design of this film.  It was not an easy process, using over a 1,000 people to get finished.  But the animation as a whole didn't do it for me personally.  It was very good, but still felt rudimentary in comparison to the earlier brilliance of Snow White.

CULTURAL/HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND OVERALL EFFECT

Fantasia, like Disney's previous film Pinochio,  marked a loss for the studio financially due to the cutoff from European markets, due to the onset of WWII.  Also, the initial costs of Fantasound also added to the debt of the Disney studios.  Like other Disney classics, Fantasia enjoyed numerous theatrical releases to generate more income.  It was re-released in 1942, 1946, 1956, 1963, 1969, 1977, 1982, 1985, 1990.  It has since been released in VHS, DVD and Blu-Ray formats for home viewing.  It's release was critically acclaimed as making film history by The New York Times, TIME, Art Digest, Variety, Dance Magazine, The Chicago Tribune and many other publications.  The film won two Honorary Acadmey Awards in 1942.  There has been a sequel called Fantasia 2000, the film has been featured in South Park and The Simpsons in parody sequences.  The Sorcerer's Hat is the icon of Disney's Hollywood Studios, and on the 20th anniversary of Disneyland Paris Mickey and his friends were wearing special versions of his Sorcerer's Apprentice outfit.  There have also been video games featuring Fantasia characters/sequences for the Sega Genesis, Playstation 2, Wii and Nintendo 3DS. 

OVERALL VERDICT:  3/5  Mickeys

 


Friday, August 17, 2012

Disney Animated Film Critique # 2: Pinocchio (1940)


   So my fellow book minions, I don't know about any of you but I have a serious obsession with animated films (whether they're Disney or not).  But the most recognizable in my culture as an American citizen are the main 50 animated films produced by Walt Disney's film studio, in chronological order.  I might do some side posts with critiques of live-action Disney films, animated sequels, Disney-Pixar films, or even ones like The Nightmare Before Christmas who have oddball status, with no specific categorization.  But this is something that I have been considering for quite awhile and I finally decided to take the plunge.  The criteria will be: plot, characters, music/songs/score, design/animation, and cultural/historical context and/or overall effect of the other elements.  So take a seat, grab some popcorn and some soda and be prepared to find out the verdict.

PLOT

This movie is the story of woodcarver Gepetto, who longs for a child.  One evening he wishes that a creation of his, wooden marionetter Pinocchio, could be a real boy.  The Blue Fairy brings Pinocchio to life, but tells him that to become a real boy he needs to prove that he's brave, truthful and unselfish and that he can listen to his conscience (a.k.a Jiminy Cricket who agrees to be his conscience).  Pinocchio is led astray when Gepetto sends him to school and goes on a host of adventures to try and become a real boy.  Eventually he, Gepetto and Jiminy Cricket are rewarded for their good deeds, which outweigh their bad ones.

*Critique: Pinocchio is very sympathetic as a puppet who wants to become a real boy, in Disney's version of the 1883 Italian children's book by Carlo Collodi.  I have personally not read the original book, so I can't really be a good judge of how close this version follows it.  But I can say that it is not really surprising that Pinocchio's main struggle centers around right and wrong, learning to use his conscience.  That's something that all young children (and even adults) struggle with and it's very identifiable.  All of his adventures are alternately fun, scary and heartrending because he honestly has a very simple goal.  I like his perseverance throughout the film.

CHARACTERS
*There are quite a few important characters in this one: Gepetto, Pinocchio, The Blue Fairy, Jiminy Cricket, Honest John & Gideon, Stromboli, The Coachman, Lampwick and Monstro. 

Gepetto - He is an honest man, who does woodcarving for a living.  But he is very lonely and wishes for a child to fill his life, hence his carving the puppet Pinocchio to fill that void.  Gepetto is a wonderful character, one of the Disney parents who escapes what seems to be the infamous curse of death, lackadaisical parenting or absence/eccentricity.  He's one of the few who cares and is normal about it.  All he wants is for Pinocchio to grow up honest and happy, plus he's willing to get swallowed by a whale to save him from his own dumb choices!  Definitely a commendable Father.

Pinocchio - A puppet carved by Gepetto and animated by the Blue Fairy, all he wants is to become a real boy.  But he has lots of trouble being honest, knowing what's right and wrong, or resisting the temptations of the outside world that are less than good natured.  Basically, he is just like any other 8 or 9 year old boy except he's a puppet trying to become a real one and needs to be an EXEMPLARY little boy to do it.  You can't help but feel sorry for him and cheer him on, even as you're cursing the stupidity of his actions.  
  Seriously dude, listen to Jiminy once in a while!

The Blue Fairy - She is not really in the story for the most part, except as the granter of much desired wishes.  Plus she's Jiminy Cricket's boss and holds his career in her hands.  She seems benevolent, and of good intentions.  But what can I really say about her that isn't already obvious, considering how little screen time she has? 

Jiminy Cricket -   The most long-suffering cricket in all of animation most-likely.  A lot of the time he comes across as a killjoy, but you know he has nothing but the best in his heart.  He really does save Pinocchio from himself and the evils of the world around him quite a bit.  He has a sarcastic streak and is always honest, whether you want to hear it or not.  He is the precursor to the sidekick in animated films like Mulan, Aladdin, and Beauty and the Beast.  Definitely adds a lot to the story! :)

Honest John & Gideon - I group these cat and fox companions together, because they work like a single entity to trick Pinocchio into ditching school and going to work for the evil Stromboli's puppet show.  The irony of the name 'Honest' John isn't lost on me, but the fact that they manage to also trick Pinocchio into going to Pleasure Island after escaping the puppet show is only a testament to their slyness and lying abilities.  They are like the big bullies on the grade school playground, only they get to you without using physical force.

Stromboli - Is the robust, bearded puppet maker who is lacking the talent of Gepetto.  He forces Pinocchio to become his star attraction, as the magic puppet without strings.  He shows just how evil he is when Pinocchio wants to go home and he locks him in a FREAKING BIRDCAGE!  P's dumb butt is saved by the Blue Fairy (he also learns at this point that his nose grows when he lies).  Stromboli is left to sink back into obscurity as far as we know, with no resolution ever forthcoming.  But if I was a puppet he would definitely scare the shizz out of me.  

The Coachman - He is a sadistic coach driver who operates a place called Pleasure Island.  It is basically a little boy's dream, with candy and an amusement park plus no parents or supervision.  However, they are also gambling, smoking, getting drunk and otherwise trashing the place!   The only drawback is that this guy turns the little boys into donkeys and sells them to work in salt mines and circuses.  With the help of Jiminy he escapes, but Pinocchio's destructive friend Lampwick is not as lucky.  The idea of the Coachman kind of reminds me of Greek mythology's Circe only slightly scarier in my opinion.

Monstro - He really does not speak or do anything important other than eat, which leads to him swallowing Gepetto and later on Pinocchio.  Seeing as he doesn't reason or actively plan villainous acts (he's just a whale for chrissakes!) I don't find him all that scary.  He's really just a big blue plot device.  

*Critique:  Overall the characters in this movie are very well drawn for an animated film.  In real life there are many villains, not just one.  And people make stupid choices that cost them greatly.  But since it's a Disney movie, at least the main characters get some sort of happy ending.  Which is just the way I like it, because it's a movie - not real life.  If I wanted reality I'd watch a documentary.  These characters are pretty sophisticated (one of them being the embodiment of a conscience) but they are always easy to relate to.

MUSIC, SONGS/SCORE

Score - The incidental music score was composed by Leigh Harline (who also did the score for Snow White) and Paul J. Smith.  Honestly, other than the parts scored with Monstro and the Blue Fairy, most of the instrumentals were very forgettable to me personally.  Nothing really stood out as very beautiful or haunting and none of the pieces had me listening to them over and over again.  I have the feeling that most of the focus was on the songs for this particular film.

Songs - The songs in this film were composed by Leigh Harline, with lyrics by Ned Washington.  They are When You Wish Upon a Star, Little Wooden Head, Give a Little Whistle, Hi-Diddle-Dee-Dee (An Actor's Life for Me), I've Got Not Strings, Hi-Diddle-Dee-Dee (An Actor's Life for Me) [reprise], and When You Wish Upon a Star [reprise].  There were actually six other songs written for the film that weren't used, but two of them ended up in other incarnations.  One was sung by Jiminy Cricket in Fun and Fancy Free, and the other appeared on the 70th Anniversary Edition Platinum Blu-ray and DVD.  When the songs were originally released in album/single form, only the ones sung by Jiminy Cricket were done by the actor from the film.  The true soundtrack wasn't released until years afterward, with the music as it was in the film.

*Critique:  Overall, the songs from the film are for more lasting than the score.  Unlike other Disney films with distinctive and recognizable scores, I feel like this score is below par in comparison.  The songs however, such as When You Wish Upon a Star, have become an entrenched part of our American cultural history.  The fact that there were so many songs written for this film that weren't used only makes me wonder if as a society we are missing something that could be even more crucial to our childhood experiences.

DESIGN/ANIMATION

Animation - Unlike in Snow White, there were far more locales that needed drawing by the animators of this film.  With so many different places that the action took place and no computer to do the groundwork for them, nowadays we'd find it to be an impossible task.  It is amazing how detailed each scene of this film is, especially the ones that take place inside Monstro.  The inside of his stomach, throat, etc. are very well-drawn and more anatomically correct that you would think for a supposed children's film.  Pleasure Island was another example of extreme attention to detail that really makes you believe that Pinocchio's world exists somewhere and the animators visited it beforehand.  

*Critique:  Overall the animation was one of the high points of this film for me.  As a child this was one of the Disney movies that I never watched, because I hated it.  I had no appreciation for the things that I can see now as an adult and find extraordinary.  This film (like most other early Disney films) deserves our appreciation as an audience for the animation alone, not including the other major aspects of the film that we could critique based on their individual worth.

CULTURAL/HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND OVERALL EFFECT

This film was supposed to be released after Bambi, but due to animating difficulty it made it out before the other film instead.  Walt Disney was really excited about the story, but it underwent numerous changes while in development and production from the original script and storyboards.  This film also was the first animated movie to use celebrity voice actors.  This was also groundbreaking in its use of effects animation (separate animators for the special effects and the characters, respectively).  It was a film that gained mostly positive critical reviews, won the Academy Awards for Best Original Song (When You Wish Upon a Star) and Best Original Score.  It was the first Disney film to win either award and both at the same time.  This has since only happened with Mary Poppins (1964) and The Little Mermaid (1989).  Pinocchio did NOT make as much money at the box office as Snow White, because of the loss of international markets to the onset of WWII.  Re-released in theaters over the decades to rake in more money, it premiered again in 1945, 1954, 1962, 1971, 1978, 1984, and 1992.  Pinocchio and many other characters from the film have a major presence at the Disney theme parks, plus Pinocchio himself has made cameos in other films: Who Framed Roger Rabbit (with Jiminy Cricket), Aladdin, Teacher's Pet (with the Blue Fairy) and Tangled.  Characters and worlds from Pinocchio have also made appearances in Sega Genesis, Gameboy, SuperNintendo, Playstation 2, PSP and Nintendo 3DS.  This is a film with a very large cultural impact.  Could you imagine animated fims withouth celebrity voice actors for instance?  (including almost all of the Disney catalog in recent years!)  Just think about the symbolic value of this film, which I know a lot of people (including myself) have never really warmed up to before.  Well, I think I can appreciate it now, can you?

OVERALL VERDICT:  4/5  Mickeys




Friday, August 10, 2012

Disney Animated Film Critique #1: Snow White and the Seven Dwarves (1937)



   So my fellow book minions, I don't know about any of you but I have a serious obsession with animated films (whether they're Disney or not).  But the most recognizable in my culture as an American citizen are the main 50 animated films produced by Walt Disney's film studio, in chronological order.  I might do some side posts with critiques of live-action Disney films, animated sequels, Disney-Pixar films, or even ones like The Nightmare Before Christmas who have oddball status, with no specific categorization.  But this is something that I have been considering for quite awhile and I finally decided to take the plunge.  The criteria will be: plot, characters, music/songs/score, design/animation, and cultural/historical context and/or overall effect of the other elements.  So take a seat, grab some popcorn and some soda and be prepared to find out the verdict.


PLOT

Snow White is a beloved princess whose Mother died when she was young, her Father re-marrying a woman who is a wicked sorceress obsessed with beauty and youth.  Now that her Father is dead, Snow is forced to run away to stay alive and finds refuge with seven dwarves who need a housekeeper/cook because they're in the mines all day.  But the Evil Queen won't stop until Snow is dead for good so she can be the fairest in the land.  When all seems lost, can anything rescue her from certain death?

*Critique: The Disney version of this very old fairy tale is of the same basic structure as the original, but with less obvious brutality and moral lessons.  Keep in mind it was one of the first attempts at a major, full-length animated film.  Many naysayers thought it would be a flop.  By keeping the plot more simplistic and less grim than the original, Disney managed to infuse it with a more universal appeal and viewing ease to help it pass cultural barriers.  Plus the overall tinge of hope throughout, supplemented by music makes the ending a lot easier to stomach.

CHARACTERS
*There aren't very many main characters who play large roles in the story: Snow White, Prince Charming, the Wicked/Evil Queen, Huntsman, Doc, Grumpy, Dopey, Sleepy, Bashful, Sneezy and Happy. 


Snow White - She is a seemingly one-dimensional character.  But despite her overly cheerful personality and approach to life and work in general, don't be fooled.  The girl definitely feels more than we know, if the look of sheer terror on her face when running from the Huntsman is any indication.  Plus she manages to stalemate Grumpy into behaving.  Not quite so oblivious. 

Prince Charming - He is by far my least favorite character.  He's a total perv, hitting on what he believes to be a servant girl singing by a well.  Yeah, love at first sight, um-hmm.  Also, after he thinks she's dead he still kisses her!!!  Not only a perv, but a necrophiliac as well.  Poor Snow, maybe fairy tale world allows quickie Vegas-style divorces?  As a character overall we never get to know him personally, or find out what makes him tick.  You could put a cardborad cut-out in his place and it wouldn't make a big difference.

Evil Queen/Wicked Stepmother - She is kind of a wild card.  The major drawback to Disney's 84 minute film is that never once are we given a reason (any reason at all, no matter how stupid would've been better than none!) for her vanity and subsequent murderous rampage.  Obviously some deap-seated mental issues are going on there.  Maybe I've been spoiled by T.V. shows like Once Upon a Time, but a one-dimensional villain can be entertaining, yet always disappoints on a higher intellectual level.  I love the cackle, but what else is there really? 

Huntsman - Talk about an almost completely sympathetic character (not quite completely, because he almost did go through with the murder attempt)!  The poor guy goes from working for a King who was at the very least SANE, to being enlisted for an assassination attempt - which he purposefully botches.  He does this knowing that the Queen will probably have him executed.  Clever, substituting the pig's heart - too bad she's a FREAKING SORCERESS!!!  The original big, dumb lug ladies and gentlemen.

The Seven Dwarves - Doc, Grumpy and Dopey are really the only ones with any real purpose in the story, other than to personify the descriptions of their names.  Doc is the one in charge, looking after everyone, but especially the truly oblivious Dopey.  Snow becomes another part of the brood, but he does seem to have a soft spot for her even though their interactions are mostly awkward.   Grumpy is a one-man ad for PTSD meets Oscar the Grouch.  He needs a chill pill BADLY.  Mostly its a case of being super glued into his ways and opposed to any kind of change.  But the fact that Snow White accepts him at face value, rolls with his attitude problem and doesn't make a concerted effort to reform him wins him over eventually.  Dopey is like a male proto-type of Dory from Finding Nemo, only he alternates between seeming childlike in his curiosity and being ignorant with his unthinking follow-through.  But he has a good heart, even when he's burping soap bubbles.  Bashful, Sleepy, Sneezy and Happy are really just there to blush, nod off at inopportune moments, be very allergic to life and always be smiling widely for the world - just like their names suggest.

*Critique:  With a balance of a few well-rounded characters and some that are fun to look at but don't offer much intellectual food, Disney has a decent cast to show for his film that everyone else thought would be a disaster.  Plus, it's funny to see the woodland creatures scampering to get out of the house when the dwarves come in and think they've been robbed.  I think the best utilized character development is in Dopey and Grumpy.  They definitely show the most change of any of the characters.

MUSIC, SONGS/SCORE

Score - The incidental music score was composed by Paul J. Smith and Lee Harline.  Honestly, I think it is the forefather of many great modern Disney scores composed by Alan Menken and Stephen Schwartz.  It follows the emotions of the film, which is the mark of any truly good score.  I bet that like with other classic films, if you played some of the score for a bystander on the street they would probably have a good guess as to where it came from.  Some of the most chilling music in  a Disney film is the music that follows the Evil Queen in this film.  It used to creep me out so bad as a kid that I would turn it off or hide.  That and the music from the haunted forest scene definitely do their job, reaping audience emotion in spades.

Songs - The actual songs were composed by Frank Churchill and Larry Morey.  They are One Song, Someday My Prince Will Come, I'm Wishing, With a Smile and a Song, Whistle While You Work, Heigh-Ho, The Silly Song, and Bluddle-uddle-um-dum (Dwarfs' Washing and Yodel Song).  Disney does not hold the rights to these songs, as they were published by an outside company who controls them to this day.  Also, this film was the first American movie to have a soundtrack released with it.  These songs are catchy and still in the cultural conciousness today.  They were the beginning of a Disney musical empire and between them and the score, they personally comprise some comfort music for me.  I think they are some of the better done of Disney's attempts at a well-blended musical.

*Critique:  This movie in general had such a major cultural impact and I think that the soundtrack is no exception (literally and figuratively speaking).  It is a wonderful blend of score and words that are sung in almost operatic style by Snow White (Adrianna Caselotti) and American folk style by the Dwarves.  It is something that every American should hear straight through at least once, if only to gain an appreciation for the roots of animated film in our country and how far it's progressed.

DESIGN/ANIMATION

Animation - This is before there was CGI, 3D or computer animation to make animated fimmaking an easier endeavor.  A team of designers was employed and they had to find a way of making each and every character look consistent and real, not to mention their surroundings - rocks, trees, courtyards, the cottage, all the animals, etc.  Each and every frame was HAND DRAWN and if that isn't awe-inspiring, I don't know what is.  Not to mention the rich colors and the beautiful settings that are reminiscent of some small, Eastern European nation in a bygone era.  It truly manages to look like it came from a fairy tale storybook. 

*Critique:  I will give MAJOR props to the designers who managed to make the Prince and the Evil Queen look so real, especially knowing how hard it was to make the Prince look like a real person (I watched some featurettes on my Snow White DVD).  Also, for as Betty Boop-like as Snow looks, she still has a very gorgeous color with the designers using real makeup to color in the panels for the effect.  It is very cool to think of this being possible before computers and programming made it easy for almost anyone, with or without talent, to accomplish this sort of thing.  Something any aspiring animator should see at least once, if just to wonder how in the heck it came into being.

CULTURAL/HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND OVERALL EFFECT

This was the film that no one wanted to finance, no one except it's creators really believed in and that all of the critics were just waiting to tear apart.  Then it came out and silenced/amazed them all.  At it's Hollywood premiere it was given a standing ovation by some of the greatest in the movie biz of the time.  It garnered an Academy Honorary Award for Walt Disney, also being nominated for Best Musical Score.  It made four times the money at the box office as any other film released in 1938.  It was re-released in theaters to garner additional revenue in 1944, 1952, 1958, 1967, 1975, 1983, 1987 and 1993.  Walt Disney put everything that he had financially into its production, and its success is the only thing that kept him from complete ruin and being forced to close his studio for good.  There are rides that are Snow White themed at Disney's parks, the characters have been featured in video games, comics and books, including Fairest of All: A Tale of the Wicked Queen by Serena Valentino.  Not to mention the original tale and other retellings that have been spawned from it.  I think it's safe to say that considering it being the orginal savior and goldmine of Disney's company, it definitely has a place of reverence in out culture.  Without it there would be no Aladdin, Lady and the Tramp, Cinderella, Little Mermaid, etc. OR anything by Pixar.  It is worth appreciation, even if a bit antiquated because of it's humble beginnings and all that is has managed to accomplish with its staying power.  You guys should check it out! :)

OVERALL VERDICT:   4/5  Mickeys